Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up. That just strikes me as causing much more work in the long run than simply allowing all YMMV "tropes" on the pages. It opens the door for any subjective trope to be added, regardless of whether it's actually a trope, because the person who added it thinks it's self-evident.
Simply allowing subjectives on pages because one (or two, or a dozen) tropers think it won't be contested is a very bad idea. How many times have you seen examples of Complete Monster or Canon Sue or other contentious tropes that are written as though the writer can't conceive of the character being seen any other way? I know I've seen hundreds. I would venture there has been very few cases of someone adding a subjective trope to a page that they, personally, didn't think was self-evident. It only takes one editor who disagrees and doesn't know or care about general wiki policy to create natter, and this trope for this game in particular has already shown itself to be disagreed upon right here in this thread.Īdditionally, I am pointing out the problem with adopting that as a policy. So, no, I don't think you can know that, either. I doubt the sort of person who plays this game considers himself (or herself, I guess) a Complete Monster, and the player character is a player avatar. Considering that there is at least one troper who has actually played this game enough to trope it, I don't really agree with you that there's a low chance that no one will contest it.
0 kommentar(er)
